PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 22.28% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 13.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 11.39%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.


VTWV

1D
0.79%
1M
3.02%
YTD
22.28%
6M
19.68%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
11.39%

VXUS

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
13.40%
6M
13.15%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
22.28%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
13.40%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VXUS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.68

The correlation between VTWV and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
VXUS

Financial Services

24.0%
21.7%

Industrials

12.2%
15.6%

Technology

11.6%
21.0%

Real Estate

10.2%
2.4%

Healthcare

10.1%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
8.2%

Energy

7.8%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%
7.6%

Utilities

5.0%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.8%

Financial Services

VTWV
24.0%
VXUS
21.7%

Industrials

VTWV
12.2%
VXUS
15.6%

Technology

VTWV
11.6%
VXUS
21.0%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.2%
VXUS
2.4%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.1%
VXUS
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
8.9%
VXUS
8.2%

Energy

VTWV
7.8%
VXUS
4.7%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
VXUS
7.6%

Utilities

VTWV
5.0%
VXUS
3.0%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
VXUS
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.1%
VXUS
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWVVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

2.57

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.77

9.84

+7.94

VTWV vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-35.97%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-11.27%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-13.58%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-29.44%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-35.97%

-9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.27%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-8.19%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.94%

-0.42%

Volatility

VTWV vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is 5.17%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that VTWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

6.84%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

14.45%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

16.30%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

16.27%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

17.02%

+6.52%

VTWV vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWV vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than VXUS's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.61%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.57%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWV and VXUS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to VTWV (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 11.39% vs 10.52% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.61% for VTWV.

VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.05% for VXUS.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer