PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTWV having a 21.33% return and VRTVX slightly lower at 20.90%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWV having a 10.92% annualized return and VRTVX not far behind at 10.91%.


VTWV

1D
0.38%
1M
3.80%
YTD
21.33%
6M
18.75%
1Y
42.06%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.92%

VRTVX

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.38%
YTD
20.90%
6M
18.36%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
21.33%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
20.90%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VRTVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VTWV and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWVVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

5.03

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.72

17.09

-0.37

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, roughly equal to the maximum VRTVX drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-45.98%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.54%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-26.85%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-26.85%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-45.98%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-7.75%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.51%

+0.01%

Volatility

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) have volatilities of 5.32% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

5.29%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

12.48%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

18.24%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

21.66%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

23.72%

-0.18%

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWV vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VRTVX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.65%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.63%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VTWV and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to VRTVX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer