PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. JPSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. JPSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 24.62% return, which is significantly higher than JPSV's 20.89% return.


VTWV

1D
1.38%
1M
3.88%
6M
15.61%
YTD
24.62%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
10.47%

JPSV

1D
2.09%
1M
5.55%
6M
14.88%
YTD
20.89%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. JPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
24.62%12.72%7.83%8.83%
JPSV
Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
20.89%0.63%8.73%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and JPSV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2023

0.94

The correlation between VTWV and JPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. JPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
JPSV

Financial Services

24.0%
24.8%

Industrials

12.2%
13.1%

Technology

11.6%
9.8%

Real Estate

10.2%
9.7%

Healthcare

10.1%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.8%

Energy

7.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
4.0%

Utilities

5.0%
5.6%

Communication Services

2.7%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

VTWV
24.0%
JPSV
24.8%

Industrials

VTWV
12.2%
JPSV
13.1%

Technology

VTWV
11.6%
JPSV
9.8%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.2%
JPSV
9.7%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.1%
JPSV
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
8.9%
JPSV
10.8%

Energy

VTWV
7.8%
JPSV
5.8%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
JPSV
4.0%

Utilities

VTWV
5.0%
JPSV
5.6%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
JPSV
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.1%
JPSV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. JPSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

JPSV
JPSV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. JPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWVJPSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

2.70

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.30

7.50

+8.80

VTWV vs. JPSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the JPSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and JPSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. JPSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than JPSV's maximum drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and JPSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVJPSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-22.78%

-22.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-9.02%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-22.78%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-5.45%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.24%

-0.74%

Volatility

VTWV vs. JPSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is 3.33%, while Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VTWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVJPSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.83%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

10.17%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

15.19%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

17.78%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.47%

17.78%

+5.69%

VTWV vs. JPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than JPSV's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWV vs. JPSV - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than JPSV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPSV
Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
1.17%1.42%1.21%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.58%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWV and JPSV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPSV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VTWV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs JPSV's -22.78%.

On 3-year performance, VTWV leads with 17.95% vs 13.15% for JPSV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 17.95% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.17% for JPSV.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWV and 0.74% for JPSV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and JPSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer