VTWV vs. JPSV
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and JPSV (Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. VTWV is passively managed, while JPSV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VTWV returned 17.95%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for JPSV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for JPSV.
Performance
VTWV vs. JPSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 24.62% return, which is significantly higher than JPSV's 20.89% return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- YTD
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 40.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
JPSV
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- YTD
- 20.89%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV vs. JPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 24.62% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 8.83% |
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 20.89% | 0.63% | 8.73% | 9.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and JPSV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VTWV and JPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. JPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
JPSV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
JPSV
Industrials
VTWV
JPSV
Technology
VTWV
JPSV
Real Estate
VTWV
JPSV
Healthcare
VTWV
JPSV
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
JPSV
Energy
VTWV
JPSV
Basic Materials
VTWV
JPSV
Utilities
VTWV
JPSV
Communication Services
VTWV
JPSV
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
JPSV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. JPSV — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
JPSV
VTWV vs. JPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTWV | JPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 2.70 | +2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.30 | 7.50 | +8.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. JPSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than JPSV's maximum drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and JPSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | JPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -22.78% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -9.02% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -22.78% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -5.45% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.24% | -0.74% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. JPSV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is 3.33%, while Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VTWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | JPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.83% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 10.17% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.88% | 15.19% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 17.78% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.47% | 17.78% | +5.69% |
VTWV vs. JPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than JPSV's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWV vs. JPSV - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than JPSV's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWV and JPSV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPSV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VTWV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs JPSV's -22.78%.
On 3-year performance, VTWV leads with 17.95% vs 13.15% for JPSV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 17.95% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.17% for JPSV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWV and 0.74% for JPSV.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and JPSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer