VTWO vs. OSCV
VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. VTWO is passively managed, while OSCV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTWO returned 6.28%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for OSCV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OSCV.
Performance
VTWO vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than OSCV's 8.34% return.
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
OSCV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VTWO vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -19.90% |
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 8.34% | 1.35% | 11.66% | 10.14% | -11.41% | 27.69% | 4.94% | 27.51% | -13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and OSCV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VTWO and OSCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTWO vs. OSCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWO
OSCV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
VTWO
OSCV
Technology
VTWO
OSCV
Healthcare
VTWO
OSCV
Financial Services
VTWO
OSCV
Consumer Cyclical
VTWO
OSCV
Real Estate
VTWO
OSCV
Energy
VTWO
OSCV
Basic Materials
VTWO
OSCV
Utilities
VTWO
OSCV
Communication Services
VTWO
OSCV
-
Consumer Defensive
VTWO
OSCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
OSCV
VTWO vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 1.81 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 5.34 | +7.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.03 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.36 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum OSCV drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and OSCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -42.40% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -7.55% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -22.92% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -22.92% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -3.46% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -7.60% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.55% | +0.53% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) at 3.47%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | OSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 3.47% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 9.45% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 13.37% | +5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 17.26% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 20.91% | +2.17% |
VTWO vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OSCV's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWO vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than OSCV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWO and OSCV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to OSCV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs OSCV's -42.40%.
On 5-year performance, VTWO leads with 6.28% vs 5.11% for OSCV. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 6.28% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWO and 0.79% for OSCV.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWO and OSCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer