VTWG vs. SMMD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - VTWG tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index while SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTWG returned 5.42%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for SMMD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SMMD.

Performance

VTWG vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTWG having a 21.49% return and SMMD slightly higher at 22.34%.

VTWG

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 17.77%
• 1Y: 40.63%
• 3Y*: 19.77%
• 5Y*: 5.42%
• 10Y*: 12.57%

SMMD

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 22.34%
• 6M: 19.62%
• 1Y: 38.74%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: 7.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWG vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF	21.49%	13.07%	15.15%	18.90%	-26.49%	2.84%	34.72%	28.75%	-9.45%	12.30%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	22.34%	11.72%	11.87%	17.71%	-18.53%	18.30%	19.98%	28.01%	-10.58%	11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWG and SMMD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2017	0.91

The correlation between VTWG and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWG vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTWG	SMMD
Technology	25.8%	22.7%
Industrials	23.1%	21.5%
Healthcare	22.0%	10.9%
Financial Services	7.8%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	9.9%
Basic Materials	4.0%	4.0%
Energy	3.1%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	2.7%
Communication Services	2.2%	1.9%
Real Estate	2.0%	6.1%
Utilities	0.6%	2.6%

Return for Risk

VTWG vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWG

VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 62
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SMMD

SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 80
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWG vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VTWG	SMMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.19	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.03	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	4.03	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	15.26	-5.42

VTWG vs. SMMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SMMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWG and SMMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VTWG vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and SMMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTWG	SMMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.07%	-41.06%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-9.66%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.58%	-25.50%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.49%	-28.26%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	0.00%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.49%	-8.32%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	2.54%	+1.60%

Volatility

VTWG vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) at 5.91%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTWG	SMMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	5.91%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.80%	13.42%	+3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.28%	17.79%	+4.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	20.92%	+3.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.26%	22.37%	+1.89%

VTWG vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTWG vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison

VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SMMD's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	1.05%	1.28%	1.27%	1.44%	1.79%	1.12%	1.31%	1.50%	2.45%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF	0.58%	0.64%	0.55%	0.79%	0.71%	0.54%	0.48%	0.72%	0.72%	0.64%	0.96%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTWG and SMMD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, VTWG and SMMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VTWG or SMMD?

VTWG has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to SMMD (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs SMMD's -41.06%.

Which ETF is better, VTWG or SMMD?

On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.98% vs 5.42% for VTWG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SMMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTWG or SMMD?

Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTWG or SMMD?

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SMMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTWG or SMMD?

SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.58% for VTWG.

What is the main difference between VTWG and SMMD?

VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWG and 0.15% for SMMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.