VTV vs. VTWV
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.64%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for VTWV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWV.
Performance
VTV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 19.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed VTWV with an annualized return of 12.64%, while VTWV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
VTWV
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 19.49%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
VTV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.24% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 19.49% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and VTWV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VTV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
VTWV
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
VTWV
Healthcare
VTV
VTWV
Industrials
VTV
VTWV
Technology
VTV
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
VTV
VTWV
Energy
VTV
VTWV
Utilities
VTV
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
VTWV
Communication Services
VTV
VTWV
Basic Materials
VTV
VTWV
Real Estate
VTV
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
VTWV
VTV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 4.74 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 16.17 | -0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than VTWV's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -45.73% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -8.64% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -26.72% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -26.72% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -45.73% | +8.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -7.80% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.53% | -0.85% |
Volatility
VTV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.25%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 5.87% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 12.65% | -4.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 18.46% | -8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 21.77% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 23.56% | -6.88% |
VTV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than VTWV's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and VTWV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to VTV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.64% vs 10.58% for VTWV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.55% for VTWV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTWV is Small Cap Value Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.10% for VTWV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer