VTV vs. VOT
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.66%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for VOT. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.
Performance
VTV vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 9.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTV having a 12.66% annualized return and VOT not far behind at 12.41%.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
VOT
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
VTV vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.98% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.90% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and VOT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VTV and VOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTV vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
VOT
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
VOT
Healthcare
VTV
VOT
Industrials
VTV
VOT
Technology
VTV
VOT
Consumer Defensive
VTV
VOT
Energy
VTV
VOT
Utilities
VTV
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
VOT
Communication Services
VTV
VOT
Basic Materials
VTV
VOT
Real Estate
VTV
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
VOT
VTV vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.14 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 0.84 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.57 | 2.49 | +14.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -60.16% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -15.96% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -21.77% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -37.19% | +20.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -37.19% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -9.95% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 5.35% | -3.67% |
Volatility
VTV vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.25%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 6.83% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 13.60% | -5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 16.80% | -6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 21.51% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.06% | -4.38% |
VTV vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and VOT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to VTV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs VOT's -60.16%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.66% vs 12.41% for VOT. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VOT.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.60% for VOT.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.05% for VOT.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer