PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.78%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.93%
1M
4.18%
YTD
14.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.78%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.29%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and SCHG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between VTV and SCHG has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VTV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
SCHG

Financial Services

22.3%
6.7%

Healthcare

14.5%
7.7%

Industrials

14.0%
5.8%

Technology

13.4%
46.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
1.7%

Energy

8.1%
0.8%

Utilities

5.2%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
12.7%

Communication Services

3.3%
16.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.5%

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
SCHG
6.7%

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
SCHG
5.8%

Technology

VTV
13.4%
SCHG
46.3%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

VTV
8.1%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
SCHG
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
SCHG
12.7%

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
SCHG
16.0%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
SCHG
1.4%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.21

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.14

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.04

3.78

+12.26

VTV vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-34.59%

-24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-16.41%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-23.39%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-34.59%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-34.59%

-2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.33%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-5.20%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.96%

-3.28%

Volatility

VTV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.34%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

5.14%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

12.30%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

15.95%

-5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

22.33%

-8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

21.58%

-4.90%

VTV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VTV and SCHG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 12.78% for VTV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV and SCHG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer