VTV vs. MGK
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.78%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for MGK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
VTV vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 12.78%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
VTV vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.29% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and MGK is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VTV and MGK has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VTV vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
MGK
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
MGK
Healthcare
VTV
MGK
Industrials
VTV
MGK
Technology
VTV
MGK
Consumer Defensive
VTV
MGK
Energy
VTV
MGK
-
Utilities
VTV
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
MGK
Communication Services
VTV
MGK
Basic Materials
VTV
MGK
Real Estate
VTV
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
MGK
VTV vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 1.37 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 4.65 | +11.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -48.43% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -16.85% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -23.36% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -36.01% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -36.01% | -0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.63% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -7.58% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 4.97% | -3.29% |
Volatility
VTV vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.34%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 5.96% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 13.29% | -5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.38% | 16.87% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 22.72% | -8.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.93% | -5.25% |
VTV vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and MGK have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs MGK's -48.43%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 12.78% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.05% for MGK.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer