PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 12.78%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.93%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.78%

MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.29%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and MGK is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between VTV and MGK has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VTV vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
MGK

Financial Services

22.3%
4.5%

Healthcare

14.5%
4.5%

Industrials

14.0%
1.1%

Technology

13.4%
56.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
0.4%

Energy

8.1%

-

Utilities

5.2%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
12.8%

Communication Services

3.3%
17.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.7%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.3%

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
MGK
4.5%

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
MGK
4.5%

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
MGK
1.1%

Technology

VTV
13.4%
MGK
56.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
MGK
0.4%

Energy

VTV
8.1%
MGK

-

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
MGK
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
MGK
12.8%

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
MGK
17.3%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
MGK
0.7%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
MGK
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.24

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.37

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.04

4.65

+11.39

VTV vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-48.43%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-16.85%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-23.36%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-36.01%

+18.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-36.01%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.63%

+5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-7.58%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.97%

-3.29%

Volatility

VTV vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 3.34%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

5.96%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

13.29%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

16.87%

-6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

22.72%

-8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

21.93%

-5.25%

VTV vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and MGK have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 12.78% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.05% for MGK.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer