VTP vs. RINF
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5 while RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.
Performance
VTP vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than RINF's -0.10% return.
VTP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 0.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
VTP vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.10% | 2.46% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | -0.10% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and RINF is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RINF
VTP vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and RINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -43.51% | +41.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -3.06% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -16.39% | +15.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.39% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 4.52% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 12.74% | -9.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 12.56% | -9.21% |
VTP vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTP vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than RINF's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.79% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and RINF have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
RINF has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.
VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.30% for RINF.
Find the right allocation for VTP and RINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer