PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTMFX vs. FFVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTMFX having a 6.03% return and FFVFX slightly higher at 6.19%. Over the past 10 years, VTMFX has outperformed FFVFX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while FFVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.65% annualized return.


VTMFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.70%

FFVFX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.23%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.71%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
6.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
6.03%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%
FFVFX
Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund
6.19%13.19%6.20%11.38%-14.63%7.31%12.46%16.28%-4.56%12.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMFX and FFVFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.89

The correlation between VTMFX and FFVFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTMFX
FFVFX

Technology

15.8%
22.7%

Financial Services

5.6%
17.4%

Communication Services

5.0%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
9.2%

Industrials

4.2%
15.7%

Healthcare

4.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.5%

Energy

1.7%
5.7%

Utilities

1.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
5.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.1%

Technology

VTMFX
15.8%
FFVFX
22.7%

Financial Services

VTMFX
5.6%
FFVFX
17.4%

Communication Services

VTMFX
5.0%
FFVFX
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VTMFX
4.7%
FFVFX
9.2%

Industrials

VTMFX
4.2%
FFVFX
15.7%

Healthcare

VTMFX
4.0%
FFVFX
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VTMFX
2.3%
FFVFX
4.5%

Energy

VTMFX
1.7%
FFVFX
5.7%

Utilities

VTMFX
1.3%
FFVFX
1.8%

Basic Materials

VTMFX
1.0%
FFVFX
5.9%

Real Estate

VTMFX
0.9%
FFVFX
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTMFX vs. FFVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FFVFX
FFVFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FFVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FFVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTMFXFFVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.51

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.21

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.40

14.06

+1.34

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the FFVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMFX and FFVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTMFXFFVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

2.54

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.58

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.87

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.59

+0.25

Drawdowns

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMFX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, smaller than the maximum FFVFX drawdown of -39.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMFX and FFVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMFXFFVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-39.04%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-4.69%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.61%

-6.75%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-20.44%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.87%

-20.44%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-4.31%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.07%

+0.05%

Volatility

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) is 1.70%, while Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that VTMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMFXFFVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.32%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

5.00%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

5.94%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.52%

7.58%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

7.66%

+1.46%

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMFX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FFVFX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTMFX vs. FFVFX - Dividend Comparison

VTMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than FFVFX's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFVFX
Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund
6.42%6.48%3.94%2.61%8.38%10.74%6.83%6.70%7.96%3.71%3.72%5.55%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.10%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTMFX and FFVFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFVFX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMFX dropped -28.49% vs FFVFX's -39.04%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTMFX and FFVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer