FFVFX vs. NADCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX).
FFVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 2003. NADCX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000.
Performance
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund | 0.25% | 13.19% | 6.20% | 11.38% | -14.63% | 7.31% | 12.46% | 16.28% | -4.56% | 12.99% |
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund | -0.62% | 10.98% | 6.76% | 11.80% | -14.20% | 7.63% | 9.77% | 12.53% | -4.34% | 8.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFVFX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than NADCX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX has outperformed NADCX with an annualized return of 6.27%, while NADCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.90% annualized return.
FFVFX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 10.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
NADCX
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFVFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than NADCX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFVFX vs. NADCX — Risk / Return Rank
FFVFX
NADCX
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFVFX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 1.29 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.85 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.92 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 7.47 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFVFX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.29 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.46 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFVFX and NADCX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Dividend Comparison
FFVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than NADCX's 4.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund | 6.46% | 6.48% | 3.94% | 2.61% | 8.38% | 10.74% | 6.83% | 6.70% | 7.96% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 5.55% |
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund | 4.83% | 4.76% | 9.54% | 4.85% | 2.89% | 3.22% | 4.17% | 3.27% | 8.13% | 4.95% | 4.58% | 4.39% |
Drawdowns
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFVFX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, which is greater than NADCX's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFVFX and NADCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFVFX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.04% | -24.64% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.04% | -5.21% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.44% | -20.23% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.44% | -20.23% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -3.74% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -3.36% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.34% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FFVFX vs. NADCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) is 3.13%, while Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that FFVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NADCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFVFX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 3.38% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.39% | 4.77% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 7.48% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 7.89% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 7.83% | -0.20% |