FFVFX vs. NADCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FFVFX (Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund) and NADCX (Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund) are both mutual funds - FFVFX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while NADCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX returned 6.62%/yr vs 5.38%/yr for NADCX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFVFX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NADCX.

Performance

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFVFX having a 5.85% return and NADCX slightly lower at 5.66%. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX has outperformed NADCX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while NADCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.38% annualized return.

FFVFX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 6.71%
• 1Y: 14.63%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: 6.62%

NADCX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 14.61%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund	5.85%	13.19%	6.20%	11.38%	-14.63%	7.31%	12.46%	16.28%	-4.56%	12.99%
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund	5.66%	10.98%	6.76%	11.80%	-14.20%	7.63%	9.77%	12.53%	-4.34%	8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FFVFX and NADCX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003	0.93

The correlation between FFVFX and NADCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFVFX vs. NADCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFVFX

FFVFX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FFVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FFVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FFVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FFVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FFVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

NADCX

NADCX Risk / Return Rank: 62
NADCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NADCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NADCX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
NADCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
NADCX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFVFX	NADCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.30	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.38	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.45	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	2.83	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.87	12.63	+1.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the NADCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFVFX and NADCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFVFX	NADCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.30	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.55	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	0.69	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.59	0.00

Drawdowns

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFVFX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, which is greater than NADCX's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFVFX and NADCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFVFX	NADCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.04%	-24.64%	-14.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.69%	-5.21%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.75%	-6.93%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.44%	-20.23%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.44%	-20.23%	-0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.31%	-3.35%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.17%	-0.10%

Volatility

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX) have volatilities of 2.31% and 2.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFVFX	NADCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	2.24%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.99%	5.34%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.94%	6.39%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.58%	7.95%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.66%	7.88%	-0.22%

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFVFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than NADCX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFVFX vs. NADCX - Dividend Comparison

FFVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than NADCX's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund	6.44%	6.48%	3.94%	2.61%	8.38%	10.74%	6.83%	6.70%	7.96%	3.71%	3.72%	5.55%
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund	4.54%	4.76%	9.54%	4.85%	2.89%	3.22%	4.17%	3.27%	8.13%	4.95%	4.58%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFVFX and NADCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FFVFX and NADCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFVFX or NADCX?

FFVFX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to NADCX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFVFX dropped -39.04% vs NADCX's -24.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.