PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTIVX vs. URFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTIVX having a 11.08% return and URFRX slightly lower at 10.90%. Over the past 10 years, VTIVX has outperformed URFRX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while URFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.


VTIVX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.78%
YTD
11.08%
6M
11.92%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
11.35%

URFRX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.46%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTIVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
11.08%20.01%13.68%19.72%-17.38%16.16%16.31%24.94%-7.89%19.16%
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
10.90%17.49%10.37%16.75%-14.86%15.88%9.22%19.57%-8.52%18.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VTIVX and URFRX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2008

0.98

The correlation between VTIVX and URFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTIVX vs. URFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTIVX
VTIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

URFRX
URFRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
URFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
URFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIVXURFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.40

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

14.89

-0.84

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the URFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTIVX and URFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIVXURFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.48

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.69

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.73

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.53

+0.02

Drawdowns

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTIVX drawdown since its inception was -51.69%, which is greater than URFRX's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIVX and URFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIVXURFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.69%

-39.33%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-6.88%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.40%

-12.41%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-22.27%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.42%

-28.59%

-2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-5.19%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.57%

+0.30%

Volatility

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIVXURFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.03%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

7.56%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

9.41%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

12.33%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

13.08%

+1.71%

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTIVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than URFRX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTIVX vs. URFRX - Dividend Comparison

VTIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than URFRX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.36%7.05%2.78%3.94%10.68%7.78%5.49%12.74%9.99%6.53%3.95%2.55%
VTIVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
2.25%2.50%2.36%2.27%2.75%15.40%1.90%2.23%2.52%0.04%2.47%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VTIVX and URFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTIVX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to URFRX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIVX dropped -51.69% vs URFRX's -39.33%.

VTIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTIVX and URFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer