VTI vs. VPL
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and VPL (Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while VPL is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.13%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for VPL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VPL.
Performance
VTI vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 30.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 15.13%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
VPL
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 30.65%
- 6M
- 33.92%
- 1Y
- 52.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
VTI vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.01% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 30.65% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -14.40% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and VPL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VTI and VPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTI vs. VPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
VPL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTI
VPL
Financial Services
VTI
VPL
Communication Services
VTI
VPL
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
VPL
Industrials
VTI
VPL
Healthcare
VTI
VPL
Consumer Defensive
VTI
VPL
Energy
VTI
VPL
Real Estate
VTI
VPL
Utilities
VTI
VPL
Basic Materials
VTI
VPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
VPL
VTI vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTI | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.72 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.37 | 3.55 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.49 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 4.13 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.88 | 16.33 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTI | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.72 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.62 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.34 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
VTI vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, roughly equal to the maximum VPL drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and VPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -55.49% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -13.33% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -16.35% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -31.09% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -33.90% | -1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -11.64% | +3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.37% | -1.44% |
Volatility
VTI vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 2.86%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 7.31% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 16.71% | -7.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 19.58% | -7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.29% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 17.30% | +1.00% |
VTI vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTI vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VPL's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 2.72% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and VPL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPL has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs VPL's -55.49%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.13% vs 10.87% for VPL. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VPL.
VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VPL is Asia Pacific Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.08% for VPL.
VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and VPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer