PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. VPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. VPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 30.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 15.13%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.


VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%

VPL

1D
0.40%
1M
10.55%
YTD
30.65%
6M
33.92%
1Y
52.92%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
30.65%32.66%1.68%15.58%-15.20%1.10%16.65%18.16%-14.40%28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and VPL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005

0.76

The correlation between VTI and VPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTI vs. VPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
VPL

Technology

33.5%
22.6%

Financial Services

12.0%
19.3%

Communication Services

10.3%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.6%

Industrials

9.8%
20.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.5%

Energy

3.7%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
4.3%

Utilities

2.3%
1.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
7.3%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
VPL
22.6%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
VPL
19.3%

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
VPL
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
VPL
9.6%

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
VPL
20.5%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
VPL
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
VPL
3.5%

Energy

VTI
3.7%
VPL
1.6%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
VPL
4.3%

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
VPL
1.6%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
VPL
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VPL
VPL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIVPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.72

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

3.55

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

4.13

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.88

16.33

-0.45

VTI vs. VPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and VPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIVPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.72

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.62

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.63

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.34

+0.16

Drawdowns

VTI vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, roughly equal to the maximum VPL drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and VPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIVPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-55.49%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-13.33%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-16.35%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-31.09%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-33.90%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-11.64%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.37%

-1.44%

Volatility

VTI vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 2.86%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIVPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

7.31%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

16.71%

-7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

19.58%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

17.29%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

17.30%

+1.00%

VTI vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VPL's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
2.72%4.01%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.84%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and VPL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPL has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs VPL's -55.49%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.13% vs 10.87% for VPL. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VPL.

VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VPL is Asia Pacific Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.08% for VPL.

VPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and VPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer