PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VTI vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VTI vs. URA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.02%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for URA. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

VTI vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 15.02%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.

VTI

1D
0.57%
1M
0.45%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.69%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.02%

URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		9.62%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and URA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010

0.55

The correlation between VTI and URA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTI vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VTI
URA

Technology

33.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

12.0%

-

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Industrials

9.8%
20.9%

Healthcare

9.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

3.7%
58.2%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Utilities

2.3%
9.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
5.0%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
URA
0.9%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
URA

-

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
URA

-

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
URA

-

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
URA
20.9%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
URA

-

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
URA

-

Energy

VTI
3.7%
URA
58.2%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
URA

-

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
URA
9.2%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
URA
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Global X Uranium ETF

Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ
Often compared with URA:
URA vs. NLRURA vs. URNMURA vs. NUKZURA vs. CCJURA vs. UUUUURA vs. URANURA vs. SPY

Return for Risk

VTI vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VTIURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.97
0.64

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.67
1.21

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.04

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

2.30

+10.22

VTI vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and URA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VTIURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-93.54%

+38.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-31.48%

+22.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-37.81%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-37.90%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-61.45%

+26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-48.34%

+46.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-74.94%

+66.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

14.12%

-12.13%

Volatility

VTI vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.50%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VTIURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

17.69%

-13.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

39.95%

-30.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

51.24%

-38.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

43.96%

-26.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

37.91%

-19.58%

VTI vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTI vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than URA's 4.58% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

VTI and URA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs URA's -93.54%.

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.90% vs 15.02% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.90% return vs 15.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.69% for URA.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer