VTI vs. RTH
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.02%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for RTH. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
VTI vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than RTH's 4.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTI having a 15.02% annualized return and RTH not far behind at 14.35%.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
RTH
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
VTI vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 4.33% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and RTH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VTI and RTH has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VTI vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
RTH
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VTI
RTH
-
Financial Services
VTI
RTH
-
Communication Services
VTI
RTH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
RTH
Industrials
VTI
RTH
Healthcare
VTI
RTH
Consumer Defensive
VTI
RTH
Energy
VTI
RTH
-
Utilities
VTI
RTH
-
Real Estate
VTI
RTH
-
Basic Materials
VTI
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
RTH
VTI vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.50 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 4.99 | +7.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -42.32% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -7.83% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -13.80% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -25.00% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -25.00% | -10.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -3.58% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.34% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.35% | -0.36% |
Volatility
VTI vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 3.85%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 3.85% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 9.28% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 12.09% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.81% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 17.54% | +0.79% |
VTI vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than RTH's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.93% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and RTH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to RTH (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 14.35% for RTH. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RTH.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.93% for RTH.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RTH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.35% for RTH.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer