PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTI having a 8.72% return and RSP slightly higher at 8.96%. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 14.71%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.66% annualized return.


VTI

1D
-2.68%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.29%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
14.71%

RSP

1D
-1.42%
1M
1.45%
YTD
8.96%
6M
9.14%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
8.96%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and RSP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2003

0.95

The correlation between VTI and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTI vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
RSP

Technology

33.5%
19.6%

Financial Services

12.0%
14.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.9%

Industrials

9.8%
14.1%

Healthcare

9.2%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
6.5%

Energy

3.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.4%
6.0%

Utilities

2.3%
6.1%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.1%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
RSP
19.6%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
RSP
14.5%

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
RSP
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
RSP
9.9%

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
RSP
14.1%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
RSP
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
RSP
6.5%

Energy

VTI
3.7%
RSP
4.5%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
RSP
6.0%

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
RSP
6.1%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
RSP
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.47

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

9.36

+4.09

VTI vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.66

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.51

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.64

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Drawdowns

VTI vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-59.92%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-7.85%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-17.81%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-21.38%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-39.04%

+4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-1.42%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-6.65%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.06%

-0.12%

Volatility

VTI vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.92%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.92%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

8.42%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

11.65%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

16.19%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

18.36%

-0.04%

VTI vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than RSP's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.50%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and RSP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to RSP (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.71% vs 11.66% for RSP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.20% for RSP.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer