PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. EUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's 9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed EUSA with an annualized return of 15.07%, while EUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.59% annualized return.


VTI

1D
1.16%
1M
2.76%
YTD
10.70%
6M
11.69%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.07%

EUSA

1D
0.47%
1M
4.24%
YTD
9.38%
6M
9.41%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.70%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
9.38%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and EUSA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010

0.84

The correlation between VTI and EUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTI vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
EUSA

Technology

33.3%
20.3%

Financial Services

11.9%
14.7%

Communication Services

10.1%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
11.1%

Industrials

9.5%
15.3%

Healthcare

9.1%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.3%

Energy

3.8%
3.8%

Utilities

2.7%
5.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
5.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.3%

Technology

VTI
33.3%
EUSA
20.3%

Financial Services

VTI
11.9%
EUSA
14.7%

Communication Services

VTI
10.1%
EUSA
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
9.8%
EUSA
11.1%

Industrials

VTI
9.5%
EUSA
15.3%

Healthcare

VTI
9.1%
EUSA
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
EUSA
5.3%

Energy

VTI
3.8%
EUSA
3.8%

Utilities

VTI
2.7%
EUSA
5.4%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
EUSA
5.2%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
EUSA
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIEUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.39

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

9.43

+4.32

VTI vs. EUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and EUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than EUSA's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and EUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIEUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-39.16%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-7.82%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-18.20%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-25.24%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-39.16%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.23%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-4.59%

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.98%

+0.01%

Volatility

VTI vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 3.92%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIEUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

3.92%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

9.11%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

12.08%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.00%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

18.36%

-0.01%

VTI vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EUSA's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.48%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and EUSA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EUSA (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs EUSA's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.07% vs 11.59% for EUSA. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EUSA.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.02% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.09% for EUSA.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and EUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer