PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 11.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 14.48%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.13% annualized return.


VTI

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.73%
6M
7.78%
YTD
9.90%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
14.48%
ALL TIME*
9.57%

DGRO

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.50%
6M
8.20%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.13%
ALL TIME*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.90%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
11.48%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and DGRO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between VTI and DGRO has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VTI vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
DGRO

Technology

36.1%
17.3%

Financial Services

11.8%
20.4%

Industrials

10.2%
11.3%

Healthcare

9.7%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.5%

Communication Services

9.1%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
11.9%

Energy

3.2%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Utilities

2.2%
7.3%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.5%

Technology

VTI
36.1%
DGRO
17.3%

Financial Services

VTI
11.8%
DGRO
20.4%

Industrials

VTI
10.2%
DGRO
11.3%

Healthcare

VTI
9.7%
DGRO
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
9.4%
DGRO
6.5%

Communication Services

VTI
9.1%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.3%
DGRO
11.9%

Energy

VTI
3.2%
DGRO
4.8%

Real Estate

VTI
2.3%
DGRO

-

Utilities

VTI
2.2%
DGRO
7.3%

Basic Materials

VTI
1.9%
DGRO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.25

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

12.53

-2.76

VTI vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-35.10%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-6.47%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-14.03%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-19.31%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-35.10%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-1.17%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-3.41%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.67%

+0.37%

Volatility

VTI vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.73%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.73%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

7.14%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

9.56%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

13.78%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

16.58%

+1.71%

VTI vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than DGRO's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.93%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and DGRO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to DGRO (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.48% vs 13.13% for DGRO. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.06% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer