PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. DFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTI having a 11.72% return and DFUS slightly higher at 11.74%.


VTI

1D
0.47%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.04%

DFUS

1D
0.44%
1M
4.83%
YTD
11.74%
6M
11.52%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%10.14%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
11.74%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and DFUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

1.00

The correlation between VTI and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTI vs. DFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
DFUS

Technology

33.5%
17.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
20.2%

Communication Services

10.3%
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
13.0%

Industrials

9.8%
9.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.6%

Energy

3.7%
5.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.0%

Utilities

2.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.1%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
DFUS
17.4%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
DFUS
20.2%

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
DFUS
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
DFUS
13.0%

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
DFUS
9.5%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
DFUS
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
DFUS
2.6%

Energy

VTI
3.7%
DFUS
5.3%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
DFUS
0.0%

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
DFUS
3.0%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
DFUS
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIDFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.27

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.94

14.97

-0.03

VTI vs. DFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the DFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and DFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIDFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.40

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.79

-0.28

Drawdowns

VTI vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than DFUS's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and DFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIDFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-24.62%

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.96%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-19.44%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.23%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-5.81%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.95%

-0.02%

Volatility

VTI vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) have volatilities of 2.90% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIDFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.01%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

9.19%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

12.22%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

17.21%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

17.21%

+1.09%

VTI vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than DFUS's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.83%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VTI and DFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to VTI (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs DFUS's -24.62%.

On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.72% vs 22.37% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.72% return vs 22.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for DFUS.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.09% for DFUS.

DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and DFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer