VTI vs. BUFH
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
VTI vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.47% return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.72% | 12.97% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.47% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
BUFH
VTI vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 2.91 | -2.40 |
Drawdowns
VTI vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -1.53% | -53.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.02% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -0.18% | -7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility
VTI vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 2.36% | +9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 2.36% | +15.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 2.36% | +15.94% |
VTI vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for VTI and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer