PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VTI vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VTI vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
-3.29%17.10%23.81%17.26%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
-0.87%10.61%19.07%8.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -0.87% return.


VTI

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-3.29%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
18.60%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
13.69%

BDGS

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
0.57%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VTI vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIBDGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

1.02

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.72

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.90

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

9.84

-2.54

VTI vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIBDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.02

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.54

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and BDGS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VTI vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.17%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.56%0.55%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VTI vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and BDGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-9.12%

-46.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-5.85%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-1.61%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-0.67%

-7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.13%

+1.47%

Volatility

VTI vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.45%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VTIBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

3.45%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

5.12%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

10.72%

+8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

8.35%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

8.35%

+9.94%