PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHRX vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHRX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHRX achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHRX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 8.92%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VTHRX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.58%
YTD
8.06%
6M
8.61%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
8.92%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHRX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
8.06%16.25%10.43%16.24%-16.28%11.37%14.11%21.08%-5.85%15.24%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHRX and VT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.97

The correlation between VTHRX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTHRX vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTHRX
VT

Technology

27.4%
27.8%

Financial Services

16.0%
15.9%

Industrials

12.3%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.1%

Communication Services

8.0%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.3%
4.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.2%

Utilities

2.7%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.4%

Technology

VTHRX
27.4%
VT
27.8%

Financial Services

VTHRX
16.0%
VT
15.9%

Industrials

VTHRX
12.3%
VT
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTHRX
9.4%
VT
9.5%

Healthcare

VTHRX
8.3%
VT
8.1%

Communication Services

VTHRX
8.0%
VT
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VTHRX
4.8%
VT
4.8%

Energy

VTHRX
4.3%
VT
4.3%

Basic Materials

VTHRX
4.2%
VT
4.2%

Utilities

VTHRX
2.7%
VT
2.7%

Real Estate

VTHRX
2.5%
VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHRX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHRX
VTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHRX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTHRXVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.31

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

3.20

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.42

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.04

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.35

13.53

-0.18

VTHRX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHRX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTHRXVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.31

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.69

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.74

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

VTHRX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, roughly equal to the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRXVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.57%

-50.27%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-9.67%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-16.51%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-26.38%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

-34.24%

+9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.02%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.17%

-0.68%

Volatility

VTHRX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) is 2.60%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VTHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRXVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.83%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

10.17%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

12.70%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

16.05%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

17.23%

-5.97%

VTHRX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHRX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
3.73%4.03%3.63%2.59%2.53%17.56%2.56%2.38%2.71%0.06%2.38%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VTHRX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VTHRX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHRX dropped -49.57% vs VT's -50.27%.

VTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHRX and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer