PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHR vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.


VTHR

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.57%
YTD
10.18%
6M
9.37%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
15.22%

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
10.18%16.99%23.57%6.87%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.04

The correlation between VTHR and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTHRIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

2.21

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

16.41

-13.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

58.11

-44.56

VTHR vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-0.90%

-33.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-0.27%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.11%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-0.10%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

0.08%

+1.91%

Volatility

VTHR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that VTHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

0.16%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

0.67%

+9.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

0.89%

+11.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

1.57%

+15.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

1.57%

+16.32%

VTHR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.03%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTHR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTHR has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, VTHR leads with 26.90% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 26.90% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTHR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.03% for VTHR.

VTHR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHR and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer