PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 12.63% return.


VT

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.42%
6M
6.83%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
8.75%

SIXH

1D
0.70%
1M
1.82%
6M
10.01%
YTD
12.63%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$429.06K$537.34K$402.11K
$317.04M$378.09M$471.57M

VT vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.97%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%34.51%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
12.63%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and SIXH is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and SIXH has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTSIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.46

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

8.80

-0.46

VT vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-11.68%

-38.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-4.36%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-9.10%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-11.68%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

0.00%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-1.82%

-5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.72%

+0.58%

Volatility

VT vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.30%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.30%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

6.25%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

7.84%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

10.38%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

10.09%

+7.07%

VT vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SIXH's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.83%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and SIXH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to SIXH (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 5-year performance, VT leads with 10.27% vs 9.81% for SIXH. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.61% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SIXH is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer