VT vs. SCHF
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
VT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 12.93%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
VT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and SCHF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
SCHF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
SCHF
Financial Services
VT
SCHF
Industrials
VT
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
VT
SCHF
Communication Services
VT
SCHF
Healthcare
VT
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
VT
SCHF
Energy
VT
SCHF
Basic Materials
VT
SCHF
Utilities
VT
SCHF
Real Estate
VT
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
VT
SCHF
VT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.64 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 10.14 | +1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -34.87% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -11.48% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -13.41% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -29.14% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -34.87% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -1.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -7.37% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.99% | -0.77% |
Volatility
VT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.26%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 6.91% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 14.42% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 16.67% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 16.56% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.24% | +0.03% |
VT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VT and SCHF have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 10.82% for SCHF. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT and SCHF have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer