VT vs. RLY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street. VT is passively managed, while RLY is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.61%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for RLY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.

Performance

VT vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.36% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 12.61%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.

VT

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.61%

RLY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 6M: 16.24%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	9.77%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	14.36%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	15.63%	-11.72%	10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and RLY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and RLY has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VT vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VT	RLY
Technology	27.8%	-
Financial Services	15.9%	0.0%
Industrials	12.0%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	2.6%
Communication Services	8.3%	-
Healthcare	8.1%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	3.6%
Energy	4.3%	30.1%
Basic Materials	4.2%	25.1%
Utilities	2.7%	15.9%
Real Estate	2.4%	5.4%

Return for Risk

VT vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 65
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 91
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VT	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.73	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.69	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.51	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	7.16	-4.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	25.86	-14.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VT vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VT	RLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.73	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.73	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.60	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.36	+0.07

Drawdowns

VT vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-37.75%	-12.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-3.93%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-10.08%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	-18.94%	-7.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	-34.17%	-0.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-3.93%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-9.45%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	1.09%	+1.10%

Volatility

VT vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.47%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	3.47%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	8.46%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	10.34%	+2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	13.57%	+2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	13.83%	+3.43%

VT vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than RLY's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.93%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.63%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and RLY in my portfolio?

VT and RLY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or RLY?

VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which ETF is better, VT or RLY?

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.61% vs 8.25% for RLY. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VT or RLY?

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or RLY?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or RLY?

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.63% for VT.

What is the main difference between VT and RLY?

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.50% for RLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.