VT vs. GRID

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.61%/yr vs 19.34%/yr for GRID. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.

Performance

VT vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 12.61%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.

VT

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.61%

GRID

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -4.01%
• YTD: 23.80%
• 6M: 23.19%
• 1Y: 44.25%
• 3Y*: 24.20%
• 5Y*: 16.92%
• 10Y*: 19.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	9.77%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	23.80%	29.65%	15.18%	21.57%	-13.89%	27.65%	48.84%	42.80%	-22.69%	27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and GRID is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009	0.76

The correlation between VT and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VT vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VT	GRID
Technology	27.8%	11.0%
Financial Services	15.9%	-
Industrials	12.0%	65.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	3.5%
Communication Services	8.3%	-
Healthcare	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	0.0%
Utilities	2.7%	20.4%
Real Estate	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

VT vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 65
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GRID

GRID Risk / Return Rank: 76
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VT	GRID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.22	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.91	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	3.79	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	14.15	-2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VT vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VT	GRID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.22	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.81	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.85	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.56	-0.13

Drawdowns

VT vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and GRID.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	GRID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-40.56%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-11.73%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-20.77%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	-29.64%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	-40.56%	+6.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-5.25%	+2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-8.43%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	3.14%	-0.95%

Volatility

VT vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 4.55%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	GRID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	8.65%	-4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	16.87%	-6.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	20.03%	-6.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	21.11%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	22.86%	-5.60%

VT vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	0.80%	1.01%	1.06%	1.23%	1.26%	0.63%	0.68%	1.26%	1.28%	1.07%	1.07%	1.23%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.63%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and GRID in my portfolio?

VT and GRID have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or GRID?

GRID has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to VT (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs GRID's -40.56%.

Which ETF is better, VT or GRID?

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.34% vs 12.61% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VT or GRID?

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 12.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or GRID?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or GRID?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

What is the main difference between VT and GRID?

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.70% for GRID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.