VT vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while FNCMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.30%/yr vs 19.27%/yr for FNCMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

VT vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.27% annualized return.

VT

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 19.73%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

FNCMX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: 14.10%
• 1Y: 39.89%
• 3Y*: 27.54%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 19.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	9.20%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	15.71%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and FNCMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008	0.88

The correlation between VT and FNCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VT vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 60
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VT	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.40	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.15	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.99	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	11.76	+0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VT vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VT	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.40	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.68	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.88	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.58	-0.15

Drawdowns

VT vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-55.08%	+4.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-13.01%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-24.20%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	-35.64%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	-35.64%	+1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.56%	-0.95%	-2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-7.86%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	3.30%	-1.12%

Volatility

VT vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 4.23%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	4.23%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	12.13%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.09%	16.24%	-3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	22.45%	-6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	22.04%	-4.78%

VT vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.64%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and FNCMX in my portfolio?

VT and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or FNCMX?

VT has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to FNCMX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.