VT vs. BIZD
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.96%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for BIZD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
VT vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 12.96%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -9.87%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -12.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
VT vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -9.87% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and BIZD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between VT and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VT vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
BIZD
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VT
BIZD
-
Financial Services
VT
BIZD
Industrials
VT
BIZD
-
Consumer Cyclical
VT
BIZD
-
Communication Services
VT
BIZD
-
Healthcare
VT
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
VT
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
VT
BIZD
-
Energy
VT
BIZD
-
Utilities
VT
BIZD
-
Real Estate
VT
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
VT
BIZD
VT vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.90 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | -0.58 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | -0.96 | +12.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -55.44% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -22.22% | +12.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -22.56% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -22.91% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -55.44% | +21.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -20.05% | +17.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -6.76% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 13.30% | -11.07% |
Volatility
VT vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.60% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 15.19% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 18.50% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 17.44% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 21.78% | -4.58% |
VT vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than BIZD's 14.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 14.01% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and BIZD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to BIZD (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.96% vs 7.56% for BIZD. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 12.86% for BIZD.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer