VSTS vs. LQDT
VSTS (Vestis Corporation) and LQDT (Liquidity Services, Inc.) are both stocks. VSTS operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while LQDT operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VSTS vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VSTS
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDT
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- 11.65%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 24.12%
- 1Y
- 67.42%
- 3Y*
- 35.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 17.99%
VSTS vs. LQDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VSTS Vestis Corporation | 11.39% |
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSTS and LQDT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
VSTS:
$1.76B
LQDT:
$1.24B
VSTS:
-$0.13
LQDT:
$0.93
VSTS:
0.64
LQDT:
2.59
VSTS:
2.03
LQDT:
5.59
VSTS:
$2.71B
LQDT:
$479.92M
VSTS:
$532.15M
LQDT:
$111.22M
VSTS:
$211.50M
LQDT:
$52.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSTS vs. LQDT — Risk / Return Rank
VSTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDT
VSTS vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vestis Corporation (VSTS) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSTS | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSTS vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSTS drawdown since its inception was -5.89%, smaller than the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTS and LQDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSTS | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -95.31% | +89.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -41.10% | +40.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -62.16% | +60.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.39% | — |
Volatility
VSTS vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSTS | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.19% | 34.94% | +6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.19% | 44.95% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.19% | 53.11% | -11.92% |
Dividends
VSTS vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison
Neither VSTS nor LQDT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
VSTS vs. LQDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vestis Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VSTS vs. LQDT - Profitability Comparison
VSTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vestis Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 659.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -54.45M and revenue of 120.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -45.1%.
VSTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vestis Corporation reported an operating income of 26.78M and revenue of 659.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.62M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
VSTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vestis Corporation reported a net income of 2.60M and revenue of 659.44M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.52M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VSTS and LQDT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VSTS and LQDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer