PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSTL vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSTL vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSTL achieves a -35.33% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -60.99% return.


VSTL

1D
-0.06%
1M
-6.33%
6M
-28.91%
YTD
-35.33%
1Y
-66.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-58.65%

HOOG

1D
-0.05%
1M
-43.77%
6M
-47.78%
YTD
-60.99%
1Y
-61.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
43.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.83M$14.42M$16.77M
$651.64K$708.80K$1.90M

VSTL vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VSTL
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF
-35.33%-37.40%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-60.99%-10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VSTL and HOOG is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSTL vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSTL
VSTL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
VSTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSTL vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTLHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.00

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.74

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-1.05

-0.31

VSTL vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSTL and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSTL vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSTL drawdown since its inception was -71.42%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTL and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTLHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.42%

-86.94%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.42%

-86.94%

+15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.28%

-81.80%

+13.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.67%

-41.73%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.96%

60.82%

-11.86%

Volatility

VSTL vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) is 25.95%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.80%. This indicates that VSTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTLHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.95%

35.80%

-9.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.40%

107.69%

-39.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.01%

140.37%

-43.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.03%

144.04%

-47.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.03%

144.04%

-47.01%

VSTL vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSTL has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSTL vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

VSTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.54%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VSTL and HOOG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (35.80%) compared to VSTL (25.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSTL dropped -71.42% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -61.45% vs -66.54% for VSTL. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VSTL has been the lower-risk option at 25.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -61.45% return vs -66.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for VSTL.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.54%, compared with 0.00% for VSTL.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for VSTL and 0.75% for HOOG.

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSTL and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer