PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VST vs. L.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VST vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vistra Corp. (VST) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VST is traded in USD, while L.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the L.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VST achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than L.TO's -0.85% return.


VST

1D
2.29%
1M
7.18%
YTD
3.96%
6M
3.81%
1Y
-9.16%
3Y*
90.08%
5Y*
59.54%
10Y*

L.TO

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
0.10%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
31.01%
5Y*
29.41%
10Y*
25.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VST vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VST
Vistra Corp.
3.96%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%19.57%-11.87%2.46%24.95%18.19%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
-0.85%41.13%42.49%16.45%14.71%77.01%3.78%22.83%39.76%11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VST and L.TO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016

0.04

The correlation between VST and L.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

VST:

$8.60

L.TO:

CA$3.72

PE Ratio

VST:

19.44

L.TO:

17.05

PS Ratio

VST:

2.48

L.TO:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

VST:

$17.20B

L.TO:

CA$64.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VST:

$1.12B

L.TO:

CA$19.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

VST:

$4.34B

L.TO:

CA$7.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VST vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VST vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vistra Corp. (VST) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.11

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.76

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

1.71

-2.15

VST vs. L.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VST Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the L.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VST and L.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VST vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VST drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, roughly equal to the maximum L.TO drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VST and L.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.32%

-52.16%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.01%

-14.75%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.80%

-14.75%

-34.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

-18.22%

-30.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.93%

-11.47%

-11.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-7.71%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.06%

6.58%

+14.48%

Volatility

VST vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vistra Corp. (VST) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 6.70%. This indicates that VST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.21%

6.70%

+7.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.96%

16.21%

+20.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.94%

21.15%

+27.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.02%

19.82%

+28.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.22%

21.30%

+20.92%

Dividends

VST vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison

VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than L.TO's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.91%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.54%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%0.00%

Financials

VST vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vistra Corp. and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
5.64B
14.48B
(VST) Total Revenue
(L.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VST values in USD, L.TO values in CAD

VST vs. L.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vistra Corp. and Loblaw Companies Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
31.3%
Portfolio components
VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

L.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

L.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

L.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VST and L.TO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VST and L.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer