L.TO vs. ATD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: L.TO or ATD.TO.
Key characteristics
L.TO | ATD.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 46.31% | -1.16% |
1Y Return | 55.27% | -1.71% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 25.67% | 16.08% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 23.35% | 14.55% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 15.47% | 14.51% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.47 | -0.08 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.47 | 0.04 |
Omega Ratio | 1.61 | 1.01 |
Calmar Ratio | 6.76 | -0.02 |
Martin Ratio | 30.04 | -0.19 |
Ulcer Index | 1.88% | 8.69% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.34% | 21.42% |
Max Drawdown | -65.60% | -100.00% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -99.99% |
Fundamentals
L.TO | ATD.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$56.80B | CA$72.79B |
EPS | CA$6.60 | CA$3.89 |
PE Ratio | 28.18 | 19.74 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$42.06B | CA$55.49B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$13.75B | CA$9.40B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$4.72B | CA$2.65B |
Correlation
The correlation between L.TO and ATD.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
L.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 46.31% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, L.TO has outperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 15.47%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
L.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
L.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than ATD.TO's 0.68% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loblaw Companies Limited | 1.03% | 1.37% | 1.34% | 1.37% | 2.07% | 1.86% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
L.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and ATD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
L.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 5.13%, while Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
L.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities