L.TO vs. WN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and George Weston Limited (WN.TO).
Performance
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 2.44% | 32.54% | 50.14% | 9.65% | 18.16% | 70.07% | -3.01% | 13.23% | 14.59% | -2.20% |
WN.TO George Weston Limited | 4.11% | 28.81% | 37.98% | -0.33% | 16.43% | 57.16% | -5.66% | 16.76% | -15.87% | -2.34% |
Fundamentals
L.TO:
CA$75.34B
WN.TO:
CA$37.81B
L.TO:
CA$4.47
WN.TO:
CA$5.73
L.TO:
14.19
WN.TO:
17.16
L.TO:
0.59
WN.TO:
0.33
L.TO:
6.83
WN.TO:
8.47
L.TO:
CA$63.90B
WN.TO:
CA$64.78B
L.TO:
CA$19.99B
WN.TO:
CA$20.76B
L.TO:
CA$7.20B
WN.TO:
CA$7.52B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than WN.TO's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, L.TO has outperformed WN.TO with an annualized return of 18.51%, while WN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.
L.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 18.36%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 31.77%
- 10Y*
- 18.51%
WN.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 23.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L.TO vs. WN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
L.TO
WN.TO
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and George Weston Limited (WN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L.TO | WN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.57 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.37 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 5.23 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L.TO | WN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.73 | 1.27 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | 0.62 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.48 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between L.TO and WN.TO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Dividend Comparison
L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than WN.TO's 1.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.89% | 0.89% | 1.58% | 2.14% | 2.16% | 2.32% | 3.63% | 3.34% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 1.46% | 1.52% |
WN.TO George Weston Limited | 1.21% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.54% | 1.57% | 2.23% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.59% |
Drawdowns
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.24%, roughly equal to the maximum WN.TO drawdown of -64.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and WN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| L.TO | WN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.24% | -64.22% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -10.33% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.81% | -19.57% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.23% | -27.71% | +7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.22% | -4.29% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -17.02% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 4.68% | 0.00% |
Volatility
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 5.71%, while George Weston Limited (WN.TO) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| L.TO | WN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 7.15% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 14.46% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.79% | 20.02% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.56% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 18.87% | -0.25% |
Financials
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and George Weston Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
L.TO vs. WN.TO - Profitability Comparison
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.32B and revenue of 15.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.
WN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, George Weston Limited reported a gross profit of 4.52B and revenue of 15.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 929.00M and revenue of 15.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
WN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, George Weston Limited reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 15.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 15.70B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
WN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, George Weston Limited reported a net income of 290.00M and revenue of 15.86B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.