VSS vs. VB
VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSS returned 8.49%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
VSS vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 8.49%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.
VSS
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
VSS vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 10.04% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -21.48% | 13.05% | 11.81% | 21.36% | -18.48% | 30.61% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and VB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VSS and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSS vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSS
VB
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
VSS
VB
Basic Materials
VSS
VB
Financial Services
VSS
VB
Technology
VSS
VB
Energy
VSS
VB
Consumer Cyclical
VSS
VB
Real Estate
VSS
VB
Healthcare
VSS
VB
Utilities
VSS
VB
Consumer Defensive
VSS
VB
Communication Services
VSS
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSS vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VSS
VB
VSS vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSS | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.21 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 11.80 | -4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSS vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSS | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -59.56% | +16.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -8.98% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -25.36% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -28.15% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | -42.05% | -1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | 0.00% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -8.43% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.44% | +0.65% |
Volatility
VSS vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 5.41%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSS | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 5.41% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 12.24% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 16.68% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 20.80% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 21.44% | -4.14% |
VSS vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VSS vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.08% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSS and VB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSS has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VB (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.61% vs 8.49% for VSS. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VSS.
VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.05% for VB.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSS and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer