PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 12.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 7.62%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


VSS

1D
-0.93%
1M
-5.21%
6M
0.59%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
7.62%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

SCHF

1D
-0.56%
1M
-4.28%
6M
7.66%
YTD
12.41%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
4.76%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
12.41%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and SCHF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.93

The correlation between VSS and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
SCHF

Industrials

19.5%
13.9%

Technology

14.9%
17.0%

Basic Materials

11.6%
6.6%

Financial Services

10.5%
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
6.5%

Real Estate

7.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

5.9%
6.9%

Energy

4.0%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
5.2%

Utilities

2.3%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.5%

Industrials

VSS
19.5%
SCHF
13.9%

Technology

VSS
14.9%
SCHF
17.0%

Basic Materials

VSS
11.6%
SCHF
6.6%

Financial Services

VSS
10.5%
SCHF
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.1%
SCHF
6.5%

Real Estate

VSS
7.0%
SCHF
1.9%

Healthcare

VSS
5.9%
SCHF
6.9%

Energy

VSS
4.0%
SCHF
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.6%
SCHF
5.2%

Utilities

VSS
2.3%
SCHF
3.2%

Communication Services

VSS
2.1%
SCHF
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.33

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

8.72

-4.60

VSS vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-34.87%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.48%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-13.41%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-29.14%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-34.87%

-8.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.70%

-4.48%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-7.34%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.07%

+0.36%

Volatility

VSS vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 4.76%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.47%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

15.20%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

17.23%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

16.63%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

17.02%

+0.10%

VSS vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSS vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than SCHF's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
3.14%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.33%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VSS and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to VSS (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.03% vs 7.62% for VSS. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VSS.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.14% for SCHF.

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer