PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. PDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. PDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VSS having a 10.57% return and PDN slightly lower at 10.22%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 8.07% annualized return and PDN not far ahead at 8.41%.


VSS

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.27%
YTD
10.57%
6M
13.10%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
8.07%

PDN

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.91%
YTD
10.22%
6M
12.61%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. PDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.57%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
10.22%38.34%0.57%13.35%-17.35%9.03%10.65%19.17%-18.38%30.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and PDN is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2009

0.90

The correlation between VSS and PDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. PDN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
PDN

Industrials

18.7%
22.4%

Technology

13.3%
10.3%

Basic Materials

12.1%
10.0%

Financial Services

10.8%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
11.1%

Real Estate

7.3%
8.6%

Healthcare

6.2%
5.4%

Energy

4.9%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.7%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.3%

Industrials

VSS
18.7%
PDN
22.4%

Technology

VSS
13.3%
PDN
10.3%

Basic Materials

VSS
12.1%
PDN
10.0%

Financial Services

VSS
10.8%
PDN
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.3%
PDN
11.1%

Real Estate

VSS
7.3%
PDN
8.6%

Healthcare

VSS
6.2%
PDN
5.4%

Energy

VSS
4.9%
PDN
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.4%
PDN
4.7%

Utilities

VSS
2.5%
PDN
2.4%

Communication Services

VSS
2.3%
PDN
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. PDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. PDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSSPDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.47

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

9.64

-0.51

VSS vs. PDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the PDN Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and PDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSSPDNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.91

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.40

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.27

+0.27

Drawdowns

VSS vs. PDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum PDN drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and PDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSPDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-59.32%

+15.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.26%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-13.25%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-33.68%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-41.94%

-1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-2.62%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-11.59%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.88%

+0.12%

Volatility

VSS vs. PDN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) at 4.74%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSPDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

4.74%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

12.11%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

14.61%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.34%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.06%

+0.21%

VSS vs. PDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PDN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. PDN - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, which matches PDN's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.08%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.07%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VSS and PDN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSS has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to PDN (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs PDN's -59.32%.

On 10-year performance, PDN leads with 8.41% vs 8.07% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDN has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

VSS and PDN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.07%.

VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.49% for PDN.

PDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and PDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer