PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDN vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDN vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDN achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 13.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PDN has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 8.78%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.


PDN

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
7.41%
6M
7.22%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
8.78%

SCHF

1D
-3.15%
1M
0.55%
YTD
13.98%
6M
13.74%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDN vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
7.41%38.34%0.57%13.35%-17.35%9.03%10.65%19.17%-18.38%30.74%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
13.98%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PDN and SCHF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.90

The correlation between PDN and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDN vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDN
SCHF

Industrials

23.2%
18.1%

Financial Services

12.7%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
7.3%

Basic Materials

10.5%
7.4%

Technology

10.1%
17.6%

Real Estate

8.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

5.7%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
5.7%

Energy

4.8%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.7%
3.2%

Industrials

PDN
23.2%
SCHF
18.1%

Financial Services

PDN
12.7%
SCHF
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PDN
11.7%
SCHF
7.3%

Basic Materials

PDN
10.5%
SCHF
7.4%

Technology

PDN
10.1%
SCHF
17.6%

Real Estate

PDN
8.7%
SCHF
2.0%

Healthcare

PDN
5.7%
SCHF
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

PDN
5.3%
SCHF
5.7%

Energy

PDN
4.8%
SCHF
4.7%

Communication Services

PDN
4.5%
SCHF
3.6%

Utilities

PDN
2.7%
SCHF
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDN vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDN vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDNSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.73

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

10.46

-3.01

PDN vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDN and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDN vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDNSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-34.87%

-24.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-11.48%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-13.41%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-29.14%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-34.87%

-7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-3.15%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-7.36%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.99%

0.00%

Volatility

PDN vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) is 5.67%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that PDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDNSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

7.22%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

14.80%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

16.92%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

16.61%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

17.05%

-0.09%

PDN vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDN vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than SCHF's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.32%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
3.00%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PDN and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to PDN (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 8.78% for PDN. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

PDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 3.00% for SCHF.

PDN is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDN and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer