VSMV vs. PVAL
VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) and PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSMV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while PVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam. VSMV is passively managed, while PVAL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSMV returned 11.35%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for PVAL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSMV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PVAL.
Performance
VSMV vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 11.75% return.
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
PVAL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 32.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
VSMV vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.29% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 12.62% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 11.75% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and PVAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VSMV and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSMV vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSMV
PVAL
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VSMV
PVAL
Consumer Defensive
VSMV
PVAL
Healthcare
VSMV
PVAL
Industrials
VSMV
PVAL
Financial Services
VSMV
PVAL
Communication Services
VSMV
PVAL
Consumer Cyclical
VSMV
PVAL
Energy
VSMV
PVAL
Basic Materials
VSMV
PVAL
Real Estate
VSMV
PVAL
Utilities
VSMV
PVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSMV vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank
VSMV
PVAL
VSMV vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSMV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 3.04 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.03 | 4.28 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.55 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 4.53 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | 17.33 | +0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSMV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 3.04 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.07 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and PVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSMV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -16.64% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -7.22% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.22% | -15.42% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -16.64% | -1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.16% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -3.02% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 1.89% | -0.53% |
Volatility
VSMV vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) have volatilities of 2.41% and 2.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSMV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 2.30% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.34% | 8.19% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.08% | 10.78% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 15.26% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 15.24% | -0.20% |
VSMV vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSMV vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than PVAL's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSMV and PVAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSMV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to PVAL (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs PVAL's -16.64%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.96% vs 11.35% for VSMV. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.96% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.
VSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.98% for PVAL.
VSMV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while PVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.55% for PVAL.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSMV and PVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer