PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSLU vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSLU vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSLU achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.85% return.


VSLU

1D
-0.37%
1M
4.20%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.74%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*

SPTM

1D
0.20%
1M
5.19%
YTD
11.85%
6M
12.28%
1Y
29.60%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSLU vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VSLU
Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF
6.76%21.52%23.80%26.79%-16.05%14.05%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.85%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VSLU and SPTM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2021

0.95

The correlation between VSLU and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSLU vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSLU
SPTM

Technology

36.3%
34.0%

Communication Services

14.7%
10.5%

Healthcare

11.6%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
10.3%

Financial Services

9.4%
12.1%

Industrials

7.4%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.8%

Energy

2.3%
3.7%

Utilities

1.2%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.3%

Technology

VSLU
36.3%
SPTM
34.0%

Communication Services

VSLU
14.7%
SPTM
10.5%

Healthcare

VSLU
11.6%
SPTM
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VSLU
11.0%
SPTM
10.3%

Financial Services

VSLU
9.4%
SPTM
12.1%

Industrials

VSLU
7.4%
SPTM
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

VSLU
4.3%
SPTM
4.8%

Energy

VSLU
2.3%
SPTM
3.7%

Utilities

VSLU
1.2%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

VSLU
1.1%
SPTM
2.0%

Real Estate

VSLU
0.8%
SPTM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSLU vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSLU
VSLU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VSLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VSLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSLU vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSLUSPTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

2.51

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

3.41

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.48

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

16.25

-2.92

VSLU vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSLU and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSLUSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.51

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.46

+0.41

Drawdowns

VSLU vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSLU drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSLU and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSLUSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.86%

-54.80%

+30.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.68%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-18.87%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.86%

-24.14%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-9.05%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.86%

+0.20%

Volatility

VSLU vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) is 2.41%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that VSLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSLUSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.79%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

8.90%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

11.86%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

16.86%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.04%

-1.90%

VSLU vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSLU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSLU vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

VSLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than SPTM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
VSLU
Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF
0.43%0.46%0.60%0.60%0.99%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSLU and SPTM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTM has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to VSLU (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSLU dropped -23.86% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, VSLU leads with 14.42% vs 13.73% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VSLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSLU has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for VSLU.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.43% for VSLU.

They also come from different issuers: Applied Finance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VSLU and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSLU and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer