PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSLU vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VSLU vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VSLU vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VSLU
Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF
-3.52%21.52%23.80%26.79%-16.05%14.05%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
10.48%64.06%26.91%12.96%-0.50%3.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSLU achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 10.48% return.


VSLU

1D
2.13%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
10Y*

AAAU

1D
1.78%
1M
-10.64%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.10%
1Y
52.53%
3Y*
33.97%
5Y*
22.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VSLU vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSLU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VSLU vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSLU
VSLU Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VSLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSLU vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSLUAAAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.92

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

2.35

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.73

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.83

10.02

-1.19

VSLU vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSLU and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSLUAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.92

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.18

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between VSLU and AAAU is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

VSLU vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

VSLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
VSLU
Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF
0.48%0.46%0.60%0.60%0.99%0.57%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VSLU vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSLU drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSLU and AAAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VSLUAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.86%

-21.63%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-19.13%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

-11.65%

+7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-6.01%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

5.21%

-2.66%

Volatility

VSLU vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) is 5.78%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that VSLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VSLUAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

10.43%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

24.06%

-13.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

27.50%

-9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

17.58%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

16.92%

-0.64%