VSLU vs. FTIF
VSLU (Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VSLU is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VSLU returned 22.03%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for FTIF. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VSLU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
VSLU vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSLU achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.00% return.
VSLU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FTIF
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 6M
- 25.63%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSLU vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 6.76% | 21.52% | 23.80% | 24.27% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 25.00% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSLU and FTIF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between VSLU and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VSLU vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSLU
FTIF
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
VSLU
FTIF
Communication Services
VSLU
FTIF
-
Healthcare
VSLU
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
VSLU
FTIF
Financial Services
VSLU
FTIF
-
Industrials
VSLU
FTIF
Consumer Defensive
VSLU
FTIF
-
Energy
VSLU
FTIF
Utilities
VSLU
FTIF
-
Basic Materials
VSLU
FTIF
Real Estate
VSLU
FTIF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSLU vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
VSLU
FTIF
VSLU vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSLU | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 2.55 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 3.50 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 7.13 | -4.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 21.16 | -7.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSLU | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.55 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.74 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
VSLU vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSLU drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSLU and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSLU | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -27.83% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -5.46% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -27.83% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.14% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -6.01% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.84% | +0.22% |
Volatility
VSLU vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) is 2.41%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that VSLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSLU | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 4.00% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 10.55% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 15.00% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 18.97% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 18.97% | -2.83% |
VSLU vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSLU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSLU vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
VSLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FTIF's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.12% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.99% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSLU and FTIF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTIF has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to VSLU (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSLU dropped -23.86% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, VSLU leads with 22.03% vs 15.94% for FTIF. On fees, VSLU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VSLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VSLU has performed better with a 22.03% return vs 15.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSLU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.43% for VSLU.
They also come from different issuers: Applied Finance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VSLU and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSLU and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer