VSGX vs. ICOW
VSGX (Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VSGX tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index. while ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSGX returned 7.82%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSGX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
VSGX vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSGX achieves a 15.88% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.
VSGX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.03%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
VSGX vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | 15.88% | 30.77% | 5.72% | 15.62% | -18.61% | 7.24% | 13.01% | 23.04% | -12.87% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -12.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSGX and ICOW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VSGX and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSGX vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSGX
ICOW
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Financial Services
VSGX
ICOW
-
Technology
VSGX
ICOW
Industrials
VSGX
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
VSGX
ICOW
Healthcare
VSGX
ICOW
Basic Materials
VSGX
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
VSGX
ICOW
Communication Services
VSGX
ICOW
Real Estate
VSGX
ICOW
-
Utilities
VSGX
ICOW
-
Energy
VSGX
ICOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSGX vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
VSGX
ICOW
VSGX vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSGX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 4.87 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.87 | 17.40 | -7.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSGX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.85 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VSGX vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSGX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGX and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSGX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -43.49% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.84% | -8.02% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.83% | -14.81% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.14% | -28.48% | -3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.63% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -7.58% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.24% | +1.05% |
Volatility
VSGX vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 3.99%. This indicates that VSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSGX | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 3.99% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 10.58% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 13.72% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.64% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 18.46% | -0.42% |
VSGX vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSGX vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
VSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than ICOW's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.71% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | 2.85% | 3.23% | 3.10% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 2.49% | 1.67% | 2.28% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSGX and ICOW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSGX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to ICOW (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGX dropped -33.09% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 7.82% for VSGX. On fees, VSGX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSGX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
VSGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.71% for ICOW.
VSGX tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index., while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VSGX and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSGX and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer