PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSGX vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSGX vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VSGX having a 15.83% return and DBAW slightly higher at 16.12%.


VSGX

1D
-0.94%
1M
6.54%
YTD
15.83%
6M
18.55%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*

DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSGX vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
15.83%30.77%5.72%15.62%-18.61%7.24%13.01%23.04%-12.87%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VSGX and DBAW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.92

The correlation between VSGX and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSGX vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSGX
DBAW

Financial Services

27.9%
24.1%

Technology

23.9%
18.7%

Industrials

9.8%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.9%

Healthcare

9.4%
7.2%

Basic Materials

6.1%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.5%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.2%
1.5%

Utilities

0.7%
3.2%

Energy

0.0%
5.3%

Financial Services

VSGX
27.9%
DBAW
24.1%

Technology

VSGX
23.9%
DBAW
18.7%

Industrials

VSGX
9.8%
DBAW
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VSGX
9.5%
DBAW
7.9%

Healthcare

VSGX
9.4%
DBAW
7.2%

Basic Materials

VSGX
6.1%
DBAW
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

VSGX
5.1%
DBAW
5.3%

Communication Services

VSGX
4.5%
DBAW
5.0%

Real Estate

VSGX
3.2%
DBAW
1.5%

Utilities

VSGX
0.7%
DBAW
3.2%

Energy

VSGX
0.0%
DBAW
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSGX vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSGX
VSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSGX vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSGXDBAWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

2.86

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

3.90

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.55

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.09

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.13

16.97

-6.84

VSGX vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSGX and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSGXDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.86

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.83

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.63

-0.12

Drawdowns

VSGX vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSGX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGX and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSGXDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-31.44%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.84%

-9.00%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.83%

-14.11%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-17.87%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.51%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-5.00%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.16%

+1.13%

Volatility

VSGX vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that VSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSGXDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

4.71%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

11.00%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

12.88%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

13.74%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

15.28%

+2.77%

VSGX vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSGX vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

VSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than DBAW's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
2.85%3.23%3.10%2.77%2.61%2.49%1.67%2.28%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VSGX and DBAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSGX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGX dropped -33.09% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.32% vs 7.81% for VSGX. On fees, VSGX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSGX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.85% for VSGX.

VSGX tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index., while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VSGX and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSGX and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer