VSDA vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VSDA (VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. VSDA is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VSDA returned 10.75%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSDA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

VSDA vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.

VSDA

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	8.59%	6.67%	9.40%	8.74%	-0.84%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	27.31%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and PIT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.05

The correlation between VSDA and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VSDA vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA

VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 36
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VSDA	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.78	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.32	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	2.74	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	10.88	-6.78

VSDA vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSDA	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.12%	-14.05%	-18.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-14.05%	+4.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-14.05%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-14.05%	+11.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-4.07%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	3.59%	+0.15%

Volatility

VSDA vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 3.25%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSDA	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	4.67%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	19.36%	-11.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	21.66%	-10.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	17.50%	-3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	17.50%	-0.93%

VSDA vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSDA vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.00%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	2.56%	2.65%	2.36%	1.92%	1.83%	1.40%	1.49%	1.36%	1.69%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSDA and PIT in my portfolio?

VSDA and PIT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSDA or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to VSDA (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs PIT's -14.05%.

Which ETF is better, VSDA or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 10.75% for VSDA. On fees, VSDA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VSDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VSDA or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VSDA or PIT?

VSDA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VSDA or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 2.56% for VSDA.

What is the main difference between VSDA and PIT?

VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.