VSDA vs. FMTM
VSDA (VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. VSDA is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, VSDA returned 10.40% vs 63.62% for FMTM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSDA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
VSDA vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.
VSDA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSDA vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF | 4.72% | 5.41% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSDA and FMTM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSDA vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
VSDA
FMTM
VSDA vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSDA | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 5.28 | -4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 20.62 | -17.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSDA | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.80 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 2.38 | -1.72 |
Drawdowns
VSDA vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSDA | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.12% | -12.12% | -20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -12.12% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | 0.00% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -1.89% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.10% | +0.57% |
Volatility
VSDA vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 2.84%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSDA | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 6.52% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 17.83% | -9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 22.82% | -11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 22.94% | -8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 22.94% | -6.35% |
VSDA vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSDA vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF | 2.61% | 2.65% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 1.83% | 1.40% | 1.49% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSDA and FMTM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VSDA (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 10.40% for VSDA. On fees, VSDA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VSDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSDA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.
VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSDA and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer