PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCGX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
-2.05%12.87%11.65%12.72%-15.00%6.04%11.51%15.69%-2.95%10.02%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
-3.56%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCGX achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's -3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCGX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 5.99%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.82% annualized return.


VSCGX

1D
0.11%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
9.69%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
5.99%

VTMFX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-3.56%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
9.77%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

VSCGX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCGX
VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCGXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.75

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.36

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.50

6.49

+1.01

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCGX and VTMFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCGXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.86

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between VSCGX and VTMFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

VSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than VTMFX's 2.31% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.66%5.50%11.03%5.23%2.79%4.18%3.28%2.62%3.81%1.65%2.43%3.21%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.31%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Drawdowns

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCGX and VTMFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCGXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-28.49%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-6.82%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-17.40%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.15%

-21.87%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-5.38%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-3.56%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.43%

-0.19%

Volatility

VSCGX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.30%. This indicates that VSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VSCGXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.30%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

4.60%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.13%

8.45%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.62%

8.49%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.31%

9.09%

-1.78%