VSCGX vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
VSCGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Sep 30, 1994. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
VSCGX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VSCGX vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund | -0.76% | 12.87% | 11.65% | 12.72% | -15.00% | 6.04% | 11.51% | 15.69% | -2.95% | 10.02% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.40% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 10.02% | 15.58% | -3.88% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSCGX achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than AOM's -0.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSCGX having a 6.13% annualized return and AOM not far behind at 5.86%.
VSCGX
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
AOM
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSCGX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSCGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VSCGX vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank
VSCGX
AOM
VSCGX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSCGX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.40 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.03 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 2.19 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 8.80 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSCGX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.40 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.74 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.67 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between VSCGX and AOM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VSCGX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
VSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than AOM's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund | 5.58% | 5.50% | 11.03% | 5.23% | 2.79% | 4.18% | 3.28% | 2.62% | 3.81% | 1.65% | 2.43% | 3.21% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.99% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
VSCGX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCGX and AOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSCGX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.62% | -19.96% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.19% | -5.35% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.15% | -19.96% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.15% | -19.96% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -3.30% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -2.72% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 1.33% | -0.06% |
Volatility
VSCGX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VSCGX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.26% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | 4.89% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.23% | 8.24% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 8.09% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 7.90% | -0.58% |