PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRT vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRT vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VRT having a 49.17% return and NVT slightly higher at 51.57%.


VRT

1D
6.18%
1M
-22.43%
6M
29.81%
YTD
49.17%
1Y
66.09%
3Y*
109.07%
5Y*
53.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
49.54%

NVT

1D
6.24%
1M
-3.72%
6M
37.41%
YTD
51.57%
1Y
97.47%
3Y*
42.62%
5Y*
39.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$373.02M$340.45M$350.68M
$1.93B$1.68B$1.97B

VRT vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
49.17%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
51.57%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%-15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and NVT is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.54

The correlation between VRT and NVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRT:

$93.00B

NVT:

$24.88B

EPS

VRT:

$4.42

NVT:

$3.63

PE Ratio

VRT:

54.63

NVT:

42.34

PEG Ratio

VRT:

0.24

NVT:

1.02

PS Ratio

VRT:

8.24

NVT:

5.23

PB Ratio

VRT:

19.94

NVT:

6.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRT:

$11.48B

NVT:

$4.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRT:

$4.31B

NVT:

$1.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRT:

$2.52B

NVT:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRT vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRT vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTNVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.57

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

13.66

-8.08

VRT vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRT vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTNVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-56.18%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.70%

-27.42%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-46.67%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

-46.67%

-24.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.78%

-16.44%

-19.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-11.83%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

7.16%

+4.84%

Volatility

VRT vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 24.48% compared to nVent Electric plc (NVT) at 16.96%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTNVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.48%

16.96%

+7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.93%

36.03%

+16.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.52%

45.95%

+18.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.43%

37.09%

+26.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.31%

38.93%

+16.38%

Dividends

VRT vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than NVT's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.54%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.09%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRT vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

VRT vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 1.23B and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 558.00M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 637.90M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 300.70M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 497.80M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 215.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRT and NVT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to NVT (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer